b5media.com

Advertise with us

Enjoying this blog? Check out the rest of the Health & Wellness Channel Subscribe to this Feed

A Hearty Life

Chest Compressions More Important than Mouth-to-Mouth in CPR

by Hsien-Hsien Lei, PhD on March 19th, 2007

cpr mouth to mouthAll those jokes about giving someone mouth-to-mouth resuscitation must stop. A recent study in The Lancet shows that chest compressions are far more important when performing CPR. The American Heart Association recommends 30 presses for every two breaths taken but it may be more important to keep the blood moving through the body, particularly to the brain.

  • 22% of those who received just chest compressions survived with good neurological function
  • 10% of those who received combination CPR (15 presses per two breaths) survived with good neurological function

These findings apply only to adult patients who have cardiac arrest in front of witnesses who can perform CPR. It’s not clear whether other victims of cardiac arrest from causes like near-drowning or electrocution will benefit from a compression-only approach.

Learn more from The Lancet podcast (mp3).

NB: I suppose the jokes will never end. Former president George Bush complained of being given the kiss of life by a male friend, instead of “six beautiful girls,” after fainting on the golf course.

NY Times, March 17, 2007

Like this post? Why not read another? Every page you read at A Hearty Life in March is helping to raise money for the British Heart Foundation.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

POSTED IN: Hearty Info

1 opinion for Chest Compressions More Important than Mouth-to-Mouth in CPR

  • Sally
    Mar 20, 2007 at 10:00 am

    It’s probably because mouth to mouth resuscitation is the main high light of CPR, especially in the case of opposite sex. Also it’s because not everybody knows CPR and doesn’t know the importance of chest compression over mouth to mouth resuscitation.

Have an opinion? Leave a comment: